Editorial Methodology and Sources
Schema Reflect content is written to explain schema-therapy concepts accurately, cautiously, and in language that readers can use for reflection.
Source selection
Clinical claims are checked against primary guidelines, systematic reviews, professional organizations, and original research where available. Sources are listed in a visible Sources and Further Reading section on long-form articles.
Scope and language
Content distinguishes educational concepts from diagnosis, treatment advice, and validated clinical measurement. The Schema Reflect Inventory is described as an original self-reflection tool and is not presented as the Young Schema Questionnaire or a diagnostic instrument.
Review and updates
Articles show publication or update dates. Updates should refresh claims, links, safety language, and terminology rather than changing dates without substantive work. Clinical review is only claimed when a qualified reviewer has genuinely reviewed the relevant content.
Corrections
If you find an outdated citation, broken link, translation issue, or factual error, contact the editorial team with the URL and the correction you recommend. Corrections are assessed against the relevant source and documented in the next substantive update.